It was much longer than I had hoped to write more in this blog. I am now out on the other side of the health care system again and gearing up for another year of new grad students (and old ones) and new medical students. I have to say, going through the surgery of bilateral TMJ replacements was probably one of the hardest things I have done in a very long time. Post operative care didn't quite go as smoothly as I had hoped, particularly with pain management but now that I am 9 weeks post op, all is pretty good. Nice to be pain free for the first time in 21 yrs. Quite the freedom!
I do believe I still got pretty optimal care. Knowing I wasn't going to be broke after this surgery is pretty amazing considering the challenges we are facing in providing a publicly funded health care system. Sure, they get you out as soon as possible but I still believe nothing beats your own bed anyhow. I also had amazing care at home through loving family and awesome friends. This is pretty critical in one's ability to go home and recover. However not everyone has a supportive spouse or great friends who can make time out of their day to visit or go shopping for something. In this day and age, this type of support may be the critical factor in how patients manage at home with sometimes quite complicated post operative care plans. Sure, we have nurses who do home visits. These can be quite superficial and short depending upon the demand on the nurse to make it to all her patients.
What are other resources in the community that patients can tap into during these challenging post operative periods when they might not have other personal support? Some might say that the health care system is already stretched enough and social workers are running off their feet. People need to help themselves. Maybe this is true but many patients don't have the emotional reserve to seek out help. Pain and disability from illness or diseases zap the energy from people to a point that reaching out for help is exhausting.
Health care in the form of hospitals originated in temples in Ancient Egypt. In ancient Greece, temples dedicated to the healer-god Asclepius, known as Asclepieia, functioned as centres of medical advice, prognosis, and healing, where procedures were often done under an induced sleep known as enkoimesis not unlike anesthesia(1).
The declaration of Christianity as accepted religion in the Roman Empire drove an expansion of the provision of care. Following First Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. construction of a hospital in every cathedral town was begun. In Turkey, the "Basilias", resembled a city and included housing for doctors and nurses and separate buildings for various classes of patients (2). There was a separate section for lepers (3). Some hospitals maintained libraries and training programs, and doctors compiled their medical and pharmacological studies in manuscripts. Thus in-patient medical care in the sense of what we today consider a hospital, was an invention driven by Christian mercy and Byzantine innovation (4).
Other religious groups have also taken care of the sick such as Jews, Muslims and Buddhists. This idea of taking care of the sick world wide stems from a "God-inspired" notion that we need to take care of our community around us. We have a moral and ethical obligation to provide care. Although our Canadian health care system is no longer tied to any religious affiliation, many faith groups still work to provide support to the physically and mentally unwell, alongside the government system. As our system becomes more secularized and funded through governments rather than churches or temples do we miss an element of care that was once there? Where is the role of spiritual care? How does this link in with physical care?
We teach that physicians need to consider the whole person: physical, mental, emotion and spiritual. Health care originally was inspired by a spiritual call to care but what do our students learn about spiritual care in our secular, politically correct system? Not really sure. Should we be teaching more or just rely on the few spiritual care staff in hospitals.
I believe my vastly improved health comes from all the aspects that make me whole. I got great physical care in the hospital and at home, was mentally and emotionally supported over and over, and spiritually encouraged by those friends have a similar faith. If any one of these was not provided, I don't believe my healing would be so dramatic.
1. Risse, G.B. Mending bodies, saving souls: a history of hospitals. Oxford University Press, 1990. p. 56
2. Catholic Encyclopedia (2009) www.catholic.org/encyclopedia
3. Roderick E. McGrew, Encyclopedia of Medical History (1985), p. 135.
4. James Edward McClellan and Harold Dorn, Science and Technology in World History: An Introduction (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006), p.99,101.
Thursday 4 July 2013
Tuesday 23 April 2013
Being patient.....
Well after almost 5 years of surgery free life myself, I am facing now the biggest surgery of my life...bilateral total TMJ replacement with custom prostheses just for me! I'm only the fourth patient in BC to have this procedure but I trust my surgeon to do it well. My angst isn't about his ability as much as it is the health care system to support his work. He does not do it alone. As patients we rely on doctors, nurses, technicians, pharmacists, therapists, dieticians, clerks, and cleaning staff just for this one procedure, all be it quite complicated, but these are also required for an appendectomy. Our system relies on many folk to get it right and do their best. Do I trust them?
In some ways, I would say, yes. But then there is a part of me that feels that it only takes one miscommunication to get it terribly wrong. If the pharmacist or tech make an error, the wrong medicine can make me sick. If a clerk makes a mistake I might get an extra xray I don't need. If the dietician makes an error I might get food I cannot tolerate. If cleaning staff inadequately clean the O.R. I could get infected. These are examples that could make my stay good or bad, smoothly or seriously go wrong.
In medical school we teach our doctors that they are part of a team and cannot deliver good health care on their own. We emphasise communication skills as a necessity to being a good doctor. Not only must they be able to talk well with their patients but also other members of the team. However, do we teach this latter skill well? I'm not really sure. Until we incorporate something like the Inter-professional Health Mentors Program (see my last blog) into the whole of the medical school class, many will still not get this training (formally) in our medical school.
Where else can students learn this skill if not for a specific inter-professional program? I do believe students learn this through modelling of some excellent faculty and preceptors that we have associated with our school. Compared to the old fashioned hierarchical approach to health care whereby doctors were at the top and cleaning staff were more or less treated as servants, we now see doctors on a team talking pleasantly to staff rather than barking orders. However, we do see a bark occur at times under stressful situations. Nurses can now give their opinion to a physician without fear of being fired for insubordination. However, we seldom see a true equality of team members occur just yet. Physicians are now modelling an acceptance of the other members to the team for students to see and hopefully practice in their own clinical practice or on the hospital wards.
With more and more inter-disciplinary clinics popping up for all various types of health conditions from neuromuscular disorders, to cardio-vascular diseases to paediatric asthma patients, trainees are seeing how doctors can get along with their various allied health professionals. It's encouraging to see these develop. Some have been going on for decades. It's not particularly new but has not been prevalent until the increasing need to provide quality, "patient-centred", health care with less and less resources has pushed for this model.
So... as I face another complex surgery I do feel like I am safe and will get some of the best health care in the world. I am so fortunate to not only teach in a fantastic medical school but also experience the benefits of that training first hand as a patient.
Am I nervous about this upcoming surgery? I'd be a fool to say, no. However, I am optimistic it will all go well. Not only do I need a good surgeon and a good health care team, I need to be a good patient. I need to be cooperative; I need to adhere to post-operative health plan; I need to have a good sense of humour; I need to have friends and family to take care of me; I need to have hope! Without hope, all these other things are not worth the effort.
Well after almost 5 years of surgery free life myself, I am facing now the biggest surgery of my life...bilateral total TMJ replacement with custom prostheses just for me! I'm only the fourth patient in BC to have this procedure but I trust my surgeon to do it well. My angst isn't about his ability as much as it is the health care system to support his work. He does not do it alone. As patients we rely on doctors, nurses, technicians, pharmacists, therapists, dieticians, clerks, and cleaning staff just for this one procedure, all be it quite complicated, but these are also required for an appendectomy. Our system relies on many folk to get it right and do their best. Do I trust them?
In some ways, I would say, yes. But then there is a part of me that feels that it only takes one miscommunication to get it terribly wrong. If the pharmacist or tech make an error, the wrong medicine can make me sick. If a clerk makes a mistake I might get an extra xray I don't need. If the dietician makes an error I might get food I cannot tolerate. If cleaning staff inadequately clean the O.R. I could get infected. These are examples that could make my stay good or bad, smoothly or seriously go wrong.
In medical school we teach our doctors that they are part of a team and cannot deliver good health care on their own. We emphasise communication skills as a necessity to being a good doctor. Not only must they be able to talk well with their patients but also other members of the team. However, do we teach this latter skill well? I'm not really sure. Until we incorporate something like the Inter-professional Health Mentors Program (see my last blog) into the whole of the medical school class, many will still not get this training (formally) in our medical school.
Where else can students learn this skill if not for a specific inter-professional program? I do believe students learn this through modelling of some excellent faculty and preceptors that we have associated with our school. Compared to the old fashioned hierarchical approach to health care whereby doctors were at the top and cleaning staff were more or less treated as servants, we now see doctors on a team talking pleasantly to staff rather than barking orders. However, we do see a bark occur at times under stressful situations. Nurses can now give their opinion to a physician without fear of being fired for insubordination. However, we seldom see a true equality of team members occur just yet. Physicians are now modelling an acceptance of the other members to the team for students to see and hopefully practice in their own clinical practice or on the hospital wards.
With more and more inter-disciplinary clinics popping up for all various types of health conditions from neuromuscular disorders, to cardio-vascular diseases to paediatric asthma patients, trainees are seeing how doctors can get along with their various allied health professionals. It's encouraging to see these develop. Some have been going on for decades. It's not particularly new but has not been prevalent until the increasing need to provide quality, "patient-centred", health care with less and less resources has pushed for this model.
So... as I face another complex surgery I do feel like I am safe and will get some of the best health care in the world. I am so fortunate to not only teach in a fantastic medical school but also experience the benefits of that training first hand as a patient.
Am I nervous about this upcoming surgery? I'd be a fool to say, no. However, I am optimistic it will all go well. Not only do I need a good surgeon and a good health care team, I need to be a good patient. I need to be cooperative; I need to adhere to post-operative health plan; I need to have a good sense of humour; I need to have friends and family to take care of me; I need to have hope! Without hope, all these other things are not worth the effort.
Friday 15 March 2013
Education through reflections:
It's been quite a while since I last posted a blog about my work and thoughts related to the disability field. Sometimes I wonder what I am thinking about my work as I just often react to the work coming my way with out always wondering why or how I am doing it. I'm sure many of us are like that in this fast paced and driven society. How many people reflect on what they do?
I actually feel a bit hypocritical in my work since one of my favourite things I do is supervise medical students who are part of a special program that we've initiated at UBC to increase collaboration across disciplines in health education, called the Inter-professional Health Mentors Program. This means that occupational therapy, physical therapy, nursing, dentistry, medicine, and speech pathology all are in this together as part of their first year training. It's optional still for most but some programs have made it mandatory. Students meet about once every 6 weeks in a multi-disciplinary group of 3-5 students along with a health mentor. The health mentor is someone who has a chronic illness or disability. Our mentors include those who are HIV positive, have bi-polar disorders, a spinal cord injury, born with cerebral palsy, etc. We have 51 groups of students. During each session they are guided through a variety of questions to keep the conversations going but it doesn't take long for these groups to "click", taking off on various tangents that are meaningful to them. I do most of my "supervision" through emails and I read their reflections that they are expected to write after each session. Although they take time, I am fascinated from what they learn that we fail to teach them during class or bedside teachings in medical school.
What they learn through this program is the contextualisation of medicine. Where in the patient's life does that visit with a family doctor or a specialist fall and what impact does it make? It's surprising how much the issue of a patient feeling "listened" to is one of the biggest differences to a successful approach. Even if the treatment is not overly successful the patient feels the doctor tried. The med students also learn the value of their team players from other disciplines.
Besides the obvious of teaching students about learning to work with other professionals and listening to their patients, they are learning to self reflect on what they are learning. At first there is often resistance to this part of learning but it does not take long before they are learning to use it to process difficult things. Unfortunately one of our mentors died during the program leaving the group to grieve their first "patient" so to speak. How do doctors and health care providers grieve in the midst of a busy clinic or hospital ward? We constantly talk about patient centred care but where are the health providers in this model? Who is taking care of them? We do teach them to take care of themselves, get rest and exercise, pace themselves, but is mostly talk and little reality when you see the pace that physicians and others professionals keep.
Using the practice of reflection is valuable. I once kept a journal before I was married but now fail to make the time. Talking one's day through with a spouse or friend is good but by the mere relatively slowness of writing something down, I believe we think differently. I do hope I can be better at this blogging thing for my own sake as a reflection of what I do professionally. I get so excited when I read the student's reflections because it does give me hope that we are creating doctors who will strive to listen to patients, considering their whole life and not just the limb or organ affected. We are complex beings and not simply a pathological specimen needing another drug.
How can I help mould these students as I reflect back to them in their journaling, challenging their assumptions and encouraging them to open their eyes and ears more as they learn. I feel incredibly privileged to be able to read their personal thoughts on how the program affects them. I can say that the students are amazing individuals who honestly want a better health care system for patients. Yes, they have ideals but that's where it begins.
It's been quite a while since I last posted a blog about my work and thoughts related to the disability field. Sometimes I wonder what I am thinking about my work as I just often react to the work coming my way with out always wondering why or how I am doing it. I'm sure many of us are like that in this fast paced and driven society. How many people reflect on what they do?
I actually feel a bit hypocritical in my work since one of my favourite things I do is supervise medical students who are part of a special program that we've initiated at UBC to increase collaboration across disciplines in health education, called the Inter-professional Health Mentors Program. This means that occupational therapy, physical therapy, nursing, dentistry, medicine, and speech pathology all are in this together as part of their first year training. It's optional still for most but some programs have made it mandatory. Students meet about once every 6 weeks in a multi-disciplinary group of 3-5 students along with a health mentor. The health mentor is someone who has a chronic illness or disability. Our mentors include those who are HIV positive, have bi-polar disorders, a spinal cord injury, born with cerebral palsy, etc. We have 51 groups of students. During each session they are guided through a variety of questions to keep the conversations going but it doesn't take long for these groups to "click", taking off on various tangents that are meaningful to them. I do most of my "supervision" through emails and I read their reflections that they are expected to write after each session. Although they take time, I am fascinated from what they learn that we fail to teach them during class or bedside teachings in medical school.
What they learn through this program is the contextualisation of medicine. Where in the patient's life does that visit with a family doctor or a specialist fall and what impact does it make? It's surprising how much the issue of a patient feeling "listened" to is one of the biggest differences to a successful approach. Even if the treatment is not overly successful the patient feels the doctor tried. The med students also learn the value of their team players from other disciplines.
Besides the obvious of teaching students about learning to work with other professionals and listening to their patients, they are learning to self reflect on what they are learning. At first there is often resistance to this part of learning but it does not take long before they are learning to use it to process difficult things. Unfortunately one of our mentors died during the program leaving the group to grieve their first "patient" so to speak. How do doctors and health care providers grieve in the midst of a busy clinic or hospital ward? We constantly talk about patient centred care but where are the health providers in this model? Who is taking care of them? We do teach them to take care of themselves, get rest and exercise, pace themselves, but is mostly talk and little reality when you see the pace that physicians and others professionals keep.
Using the practice of reflection is valuable. I once kept a journal before I was married but now fail to make the time. Talking one's day through with a spouse or friend is good but by the mere relatively slowness of writing something down, I believe we think differently. I do hope I can be better at this blogging thing for my own sake as a reflection of what I do professionally. I get so excited when I read the student's reflections because it does give me hope that we are creating doctors who will strive to listen to patients, considering their whole life and not just the limb or organ affected. We are complex beings and not simply a pathological specimen needing another drug.
How can I help mould these students as I reflect back to them in their journaling, challenging their assumptions and encouraging them to open their eyes and ears more as they learn. I feel incredibly privileged to be able to read their personal thoughts on how the program affects them. I can say that the students are amazing individuals who honestly want a better health care system for patients. Yes, they have ideals but that's where it begins.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)